After early
praise on the film festival circuit, Gravity, otherwise known
as George Clooney and Sandra Bullock as Astronauts, stormed the box
office, breaking October records in its first weekend (grossing $55
million) and staying on top its second week of release, topping
Captain Phillips.
The tension
riddled events which make up the film are creating word of mouth buzz
and combined with the special and visual effects, Gravity has
created quite the spectacle.
Sandra
Bullock has received praise for her performance. Many film critics
and culture writers are quick to credit her with drawing in
audiences, but it's doubtful the casting of Bullock is the sole
reason movie-goers are lining up for Gravity.
It's more likely the action and heightened suspense which is creating
box office buzz for the film. Although critics are quick to heap
praise on the film, the writing and character development felt flat
and underdeveloped for an awards season film.
But
first: The Box Office Phenomenon (Or Not)
Gravity
is not the first female-led action film that has done well at the box
office. Alien,
starring Sigourney Weaver, cost $11 million to make, but grossed $3
million at the box office on its opening weekend in 1979. Its sequel,
Aliens,
directed by James Cameron, cost $18 million to produce, but made $10
million its first weekend. Cameron followed in the same tradition
with The Terminator,
a low-budget action film costing $7 million, which then went on to be
one of the most successful franchises of the last thirty years.
Terminator
grossed four million opening weekend and three months later had made
$38 million at the box office.
But
even if audiences aren't going to see the film purely because of
Bullock (or Weaver or Linda Hamilton), Gravity
proves in the day and age of superhero trilogies and reboots and The
Avengers universe,
audiences will go see action films with women.
Studios
seem determined to insist the success or failure of movies has to do
whether it will draw in a male audience. To draw in a male audience,
they cast male leads. But if a movie is well done, no matter the
gender of the lead, not just male audiences, but audiences (men and
women) will go to see it. For every Avengers
or Batman
reboot that does well at the box office, there are just as many flops
like Green Lantern
(2011),
Hulk (2008),
or Batman & Robin
(1997).
Many
seem to think Gravity
is going to be the film which finally breaks the studio's vicious
cycle of ignoring female moviegoers and convinces studios to
greenlight more films with gender parity in mind.
Gravity's
predecessors, both
female-led and successful at the box office, haven't been able to
break through the studio's hearts and minds, so to speak. There's
always buzz in the press about whether current It Film is going to be
the one, but then nothing changes and status quo resumes.
Look
at Bridesmaids
($26 million opening weekend) or this summer's The
Heat ($39 million). In
January, Jessica Chastain was the lead in two top grossing films,
Zero Dark Thirty
and Mama.
Kathryn Bigelow, who directed Chastain in Zero
Dark Thirty, which has
now made almost $200 million worldwide, didn't receive an Academy
Award nomination. Three years earlier, she'd won Best Director for
The Hurt Locker but
is still getting snubbed by the Hollywood boys' club.
Catherine Hardwicke, who directed the first film in the Twilight
series, which grossed
a stunning $69 million on its opening weekend, but then she was
replaced by a male director for the sequel.
Certainly
Gravity
is a big step, along with Zero
Dark Thirty, Mama,
and The Heat.
Any movie with a female lead which does well at the box office is a
success, but changing the studio system is a long, slow process. With
more directors like Cuaron and Bigelow sticking to their vision for
the film, maybe studios will finally take note. In Cuaron's and
Bigelow's cases, if they want a female lead, they get a female lead,
and if the studios won't finance it for the gender reason, they find
financing elsewhere.
Astronaut
Ryan Stone: Feminist?
In
the name of women, Gravity
might be a box office success, but shouting about Ryan Stone
(Bullock) as some sort of feminist revelation might be a stretch.
The
film isn't a case study for strong storytelling. The script casts
Stone as the rookie astronaut versus the veteran astronaut on the
verge of retirement, Matt Kowalski (Clooney). The story of Stone's
survival might not be quite as compelling if she wasn't a
rookie—she'd have more familiarity with the shuttles and their
systems—but the rookie/veteran trope was a little grating,
especially since the woman was cast as the rookie and the man as the
veteran.
One
could argue that Stone relies rather heavily on a male figure
throughout the first half of the film. Even later in the film, he
reappears in a vision to offer her advice which will save her life.
So are the decisions she makes purely her own or reliant on a male
father figure?
In
addition to the studios eventually getting the message that women
leads are marketable, maybe they will also realize audiences are
smarter and more capable than they once were. Moviegoing audiences
also watch television and over the past twenty years, television
writing has gotten infinitely smarter and deeper. If movie audiences
demand a higher level of writing in films, it could take film,
especially genre films, past the usual tropes and develop complex
characters. Gravity
has plenty heart-pounding tension but very little character
development.